Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Laryngoscope ; 134(2): 701-707, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462352

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We characterize functional outcomes in head and neck cancer of unknown primary (CUP) based on primary site identification. METHODS: In this retrospective study, CUP cases were categorized as known primaries (KP) if a tumor was localized after diagnostic workup or persisting unknown primaries (UP). Age, sex, HPV status, diagnostic methods, and treatments regimens were collected. Pretreatment and short-term posttreatment (3-6 months after completion of treatment) weights, PHQ-9, Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), and Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) scores were compared between UP and KP. RESULTS: Among 67 CUP patients, 35 (52.2%) had identified primaries (91.4% oropharyngeal and 8.6% nasopharyngeal). KP patients were younger (58 vs. 64, p = 0.04) and more likely to be HPV-positive (88.6% vs. 50%, p = 0.002). Overall detection rates were 16.7% for PET/CT, 34.7% for direct laryngoscopy, and 46.6% for transoral robotic oropharyngectomy. Diagnostic workup was not significantly different between groups. Patients with KP received smaller intermediate radiation dose volumes (436.5 vs. 278.9 cc, p = 0.03) and lower doses to the cricopharyngeal muscle (41.6 vs. 24.6 Gy, p = 0.03).Pretreatment weights, PHQ-9, EAT-10, and VHI-10 scores did not differ between groups. However, posttreatment, UP had greater relative weight loss (-14.1% vs. -7.6%, p = 0.032), higher EAT-10 scores (12.5 vs. 3, p = 0.004), and higher PHQ-9 scores (6 vs. 1.4, p = 0.017). Specifically, UP reported more stressful swallowing, difficulty swallowing solids and pills, and swallowing affecting public eating. CONCLUSION: KP patients experienced less weight loss, depression, and reduced swallowing dysfunction, highlighting an early functional benefit of primary tumor identification likely driven by reduced radiation treatment volumes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:701-707, 2024.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Humans , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Radiopharmaceuticals , Weight Loss , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(23)2023 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38067253

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous malignancy often treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). In the node-positive setting, adjuvant RT reduces the risk of locoregional recurrence, but historical data suggest that distant failure is a persistent issue and often fatal. This has prompted new efforts to intensify treatment in these patients with the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, newer diagnostic techniques have led to stage migration in patients with previously subclinical metastatic disease; consequently, preventing locoregional recurrence may be a higher priority in node-positive MCC patients than was previously believed. Recent trials in node-positive MCC, such as ADMEC-O, have had lower rates of adjuvant RT utilization in treatment versus control arms, which may have attenuated the observed effect of adjuvant immunotherapy. The low utilization of adjuvant RT may have also resulted in a higher recurrence rate in patients who did not have a complete response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the CHECKMATE 358 trial. Altogether, these are important considerations for ongoing and future immunotherapy trials in MCC and may affect the interpretation of their results. Ongoing clinical trials may determine which patients are at low risk of recurrence when treated with immunotherapy and whether adjuvant RT could be omitted in select patients.

3.
J Clin Neurosci ; 115: 95-100, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541084

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral atrophy with leukoencephalopathy is a known morbidity after whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), resulting in ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly with leukoencephalopathy (EVL). Here we studied the correlation between WBRT, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and risk for EVL in brain metastases patients. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we identified 195 patients (with 1,018 BM) who underwent SRS for BM (2007-2017) and had > 3 months of MRI follow-up. All patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting were excluded. Cerebral atrophy was measured by ex-vacuo-ventriculomegaly, defined based on Evans' criteria. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly was observed on pre-radiosurgery imaging in 29.7% (58/195) of the study cohort. On multivariate analysis, older age was the only variable associated with pre-radiosurgery ventriculomegaly. Of the 137 patients with normal ventricular size before radiosurgery, 27 (19.7 %) developed ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly and leukoencephalopathy (EVL) post-SRS. In univariate analysis, previous whole brain radiation therapy was the main factor associated with increased risk for developing EVL (OR = 5.08, p < 0.001). In bivariate models that included prior receipt of WBRT, both the number of SRS treatments (OR = 1.499, p = 0.025) and WBRT (OR = 11.321, p = 0.003 were independently associated with increased EVL risk. CONCLUSIONS: While repeat radiosurgery contributes to the risk of EVL in BM patients, this risk is ∼20-fold lower than that associated with WBRT.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Hydrocephalus , Leukoencephalopathies , Radiosurgery , Humans , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/methods , Retrospective Studies , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Leukoencephalopathies/diagnostic imaging , Leukoencephalopathies/etiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Hydrocephalus/surgery
4.
Front Oncol ; 12: 991838, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36185196

ABSTRACT

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from an unknown primary tumor (SCCUP) accounts for 2.0%-5.0% of all head and neck cancers. SCCUP presents as enlarged cervical lymph nodes without evidence of a primary tumor upon physical examination. Primary site detection is important to target treatment and avoid treatment-related morbidity. In this review, we discuss updates in SCCUP management. Diagnostic workup should focus on localization of the primary tumor in SCCUP. Initial workup centers on neck biopsy to confirm the presence of SCC. Given the increasing incidence of HPV-related SCC in the oropharynx, HPV testing is crucial. An HPV-positive status can localize the tumor to the oropharynx, a common site for occult tumors. Imaging includes neck CT and/or MRI, and PET/CT. After imaging, panendoscopy, palatine tonsillectomy or diagnostic transoral robotic surgery can facilitate high rates of primary tumor localization. Primary tumor localization influences treatments administered. SCCUP has traditionally been treated aggressively with large treatment fields to all potential disease sites, which can induce weight loss and swallowing dysfunction. As a result, primary localization can reduce radiation fields and provide possible de-escalation to primary surgical management. Advances in intensity-modulated radiation therapy and dose management also have the potential to improve functional outcomes in SCCUP patients. Given the improved prognosis associated with HPV-positive SCCs, HPV tumor status may also inform future treatment de-intensification to reduce treatment-related toxicity.

5.
J Transl Med ; 20(1): 360, 2022 08 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35962345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine incorporating genetic profiling is becoming a standard of care in medical oncology. However, in the field of radiation oncology there is limited use of genetic profiling and the impact of germline genetic biomarkers on radiosensitivity, radioresistance, or patient outcomes after radiation therapy is poorly understood. In HNSCC, the toxicity associated with treatment can cause delays or early cessation which has been associated with worse outcomes. Identifying potential biomarkers which can help predict toxicity, as well as response to treatment, is of significant interest. METHODS: Patients with HNSCC who received RT and underwent next generation sequencing of somatic tumor samples, transcriptome RNA-seq with matched normal tissue samples were included. Patients were then grouped by propensity towards increased late vs. early toxicity (Group A) and those without (Group B), assessed by CTCAE v5.0. The groups were then analyzed for association of specific germline variants with toxicity and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In this study we analyzed 37 patients for correlation between germline variants and toxicity. We observed that TSC2, HLA-A, TET2, GEN1, NCOR2 and other germline variants were significantly associated with long term toxicities. 34 HNSCC patients treated with curative intent were evaluated for clinical outcomes. Group A had significantly improved overall survival as well as improved rates of locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease. Specific variants associated with improved clinical outcomes included TSC2, FANCD2, and PPP1R15A, while the HLA-A and GEN1 variants were not correlated with survival or recurrence. A group of five HLA-DMA/HLA-DMB variants was only found in Group B and was associated with a higher risk of locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that germline genetic biomarkers may have utility in predicting toxicity and outcomes after radiation therapy and deserve further investigation in precision radiation medicine approaches.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Germ Cells , HLA-A Antigens , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 112(1): 39, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34919881
7.
J Transl Med ; 19(1): 380, 2021 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34493300

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if HPV status serves as an independent predictor of early and late dysphagia outcomes when considered alongside standard patient characteristics and dose metrics for head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The age, sex, smoking history, cancer type (oropharyngeal vs non-oropharyngeal), HPV status, and early and late dysphagia outcomes were obtained for 99 retrospective head and neck cancer patients treated at our clinic with radiotherapy. Additionally for each patient, the mean radiation dose to the pharynx, superior/middle/inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, and cricopharyngeus was calculated. The predictive power of these clinical characteristics and radiation metrics was evaluated using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Then multi-variate logistic models were built for each outcome using a single dose metric at a time, and either HPV status, cancer type, or both. Multi-variate models were built using both top-down and bottom-up technique to establish the most predictive independent covariates. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis for early dysphagia, cancer type (p = 0.04) and four dose metrics (p ≤ 0.02) were significantly associated with outcome, while for late dysphagia, only cancer type (p = 0.04) was associated with outcome. In the multivariate analysis for early dysphagia, cancer type, smoking history, and mean dose to the five structures were consistently selected as covariates. For late dysphagia, either HPV status or cancer type was selected in each model and the mean dose to the cricopharyngeus was selected in one model. CONCLUSION: While HPV is a known contributing factor for tumor prognosis in oropharyngeal cancers, its role in normal tissue toxicities for head and neck cancers has not previously been evaluated. Our results indicate having an oropharyngeal cancer may increase a patient's risk of high-grade early and late dysphagia while HPV status was seldom selected.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Pharyngeal Muscles , Retrospective Studies
8.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 44(10): 536-543, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34392256

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective clinical trial of patients receiving radiation (RT) for brain metastases to identify clinical predictors of pre-RT and post-RT health-related quality of life (hrQoL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with brain metastases completed overall (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C15-PAL) and brain tumor-specific (QLQ-BN20) hrQoL assessments pre-RT (n=127) and 1 (n=56) and 3 (n=45) months post-RT. Linear and proportional-odds models analyzed patient, disease, and treatment predictors of baseline, 1-, and 3-month hrQoL scores. Generalized estimating equations and repeated measures proportional-odds models assessed predictors of longitudinal hrQoL scores. RESULTS: Most patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (69.3%) and had non-small-cell lung (36.0%) metastases. Compared with SRS, receipt of whole brain RT was associated with a higher odds of appetite loss (baseline P=0.04, 1 mo P=0.02) and greater motor dysfunction (baseline P=0.01, 1 mo P=0.003, 3 mo P=0.02). Receipt of systemic therapy was associated with better emotional functioning after RT (1 mo P=0.03, 3 mo P=0.01). Compared with patients with breast cancer, patients with melanoma had higher odds of better global hrQoL (P=0.01) and less pain (P=0.048), while patients with lung cancer reported lower physical function (P=0.048) 3 months post-RT. Nonmarried patients had greater odds of higher global hrQoL (1 mo P=0.01), while male patients had lower odds of reporting more hair loss (baseline P=0.03, 3 mo P=0.045). Patients 60 years and above had lower odds of more drowsiness (P=0.04) and pain (P=0.049) over time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving SRS versus whole brain RT and systemic therapy reported better posttreatment hrQoL. In addition, melanoma metastases, nonmarried, male, and older patients with reported better hrQoL in various as well as domains after intracranial RT.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
9.
Int J Part Ther ; 8(1): 50-61, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34285935

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A multi-field optimization (MFO) technique that uses beam-specific spot placement volumes (SPVs) and spot avoidance volumes (SAVs) is introduced for bilateral head and neck (H&N) cancers. These beam-specific volumes are used to guide the optimizer to consistently achieve optimal organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing with target coverage and plan robustness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implementation of this technique using a 4-beam, 5-beam, and variant 5-beam arrangement is discussed. The generation of beam-specific SPVs and SAVs derived from target and OARs are shown. The SPVs for select fields are further partitioned into optimization volumes for uniform dose distributions that resemble those of single-field optimization (SFO). A conventional MFO plan that does not use beam-specific spot placement guidance (MFOcon) and an MFO plan that uses only beam-specific SPV (MFOspv) are compared with current technique (MFOspv/sav), using both simulated scenarios and forward-calculated plans on weekly verification computed tomography (VFCT) scans. RESULTS: Dose distribution characteristics of the 4-beam, 5-beam, and variant 5-beam technique are demonstrated with discussion on OAR sparing. When comparing the MFOcon, MFOspv, and MFOspv/sav, the MFOspv/sav is shown to have superior OAR sparing in 9 of the 14 OARs examined. It also shows clinical plan robustness when evaluated by using both simulated uncertainty scenarios and forward-calculated weekly VFCTs throughout the 7-week treatment course. CONCLUSION: The MFOspv/sav technique is a systematic approach using SPVs and SAVs to guide the optimizer to consistently reach desired OAR dose values and plan robustness.

10.
J Transl Med ; 19(1): 212, 2021 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimizing the therapeutic ratio for radiation therapy (RT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is uniquely challenging owing to high rates of early and late toxicity involving nearby organs at risk. These toxicities have a profound impact on treatment compliance and quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that RT dose alone cannot fully account for the variable severity of RT-related adverse events (rtAEs) observed in HNSCC patients. Next-generation sequencing has become an increasingly valuable tool with widespread use in the oncology field and is being robustly explored for predicting rtAEs beyond dosimetric data. METHODS: Patients who had Foundation Medicine sequencing data and received RT for primary or locally recurrent HNSCC were selected for this study. Early and late toxicity data were collected and reported based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Dosimetric parameters were collected for pertinent structures. RESULTS: A total of HNSCC 37 patients were analyzed in this study. Genetic alterations in BRCA2, ERBB3, NOTCH1 and CCND1 were all associated with higher mean grade of toxicity with BRCA2 alteration implicated in all toxicity parameters evaluated including mucositis, early dysphagia, xerostomia and to a lesser extent, late dysphagia. Interestingly, patients who exhibited alterations in both BRCA2 and ERBB3 experienced a twofold or greater increase in early dysphagia, early xerostomia and late dysphagia compared to ERBB3 alteration alone. Furthermore, several gene alterations were associated with improved toxicity outcomes. Within an RT supersensitive patient subset, alterations were found in TNFAIP3, HNF1A, SPTA1 and CASP8. All of these alterations were not found in the RT insensitive patient subset. We found 17 gene alterations in the RT insensitive patient subset that were not found in the RT supersensitive patient subset. CONCLUSION: Despite consistent RT dosimetric parameters, patients with HNSCC experience heterogeneous patterns of rtAEs. Identifying factors associated with toxicity outcomes offers a new avenue for personalized precision RT therapy and prophylactic management. Here, next-generation sequencing in a population of HNSCC patients correlates several genetic alterations with severity of rtAEs. Further analysis is urgently needed to identify genetic patterns associated with rtAEs in order to reduce harmful outcomes in this challenging population.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Quality of Life , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/genetics
11.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 129(9): 930-934, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32340473

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report a case of laryngeal involvement of mycosis fungoides and its symptomatic treatment with laser-assisted surgical ablation. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: A 76-year-old woman with longstanding MF previously treated with Brentuximab Vedotin who developed persistent cough and dysphonia. The patient's laryngeal disease burden was treated with KTP-laser ablation and further reduced with doxorubicin and radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although laryngeal, and especially glottic, involvement is a rare finding, suspicion should be maintained in symptomatic patients with cutaneous mycosis fungoides. This the first reported surgical laser treatment of laryngeal symptoms in this context, which can greatly improve a patient's quality of life.


Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms , Mycosis Fungoides , Vocal Cords , Aged , Female , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laser Therapy , Mycosis Fungoides/diagnosis , Mycosis Fungoides/surgery
12.
Brachytherapy ; 19(6): 881-888, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917179

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: While peer review is critical for quality and safety in radiotherapy, there are neither formal guidelines nor format examples for brachytherapy (BT) peer review. We report on a gynecologic BT peer-review method implemented at a high-volume academic center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed discussions at bimonthly gynecologic BT peer-review rounds between July and December 2018. Rounds consisted of 2-5 attending physicians with gynecologic BT expertise, 1-2 BT physicists, and trainees. Peer-review targets included clinical case review, contours, implant technique, dose/fractionation, and target/organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry. The projected/final target and OAR dosimetry were analyzed. RESULTS: 55 separate implants from 44 patients were reviewed. Implants were mostly reviewed after the first BT fraction (n = 16, 29%) or at another time point during BT (n = 20, 36%). One (2%) implant was presented prospectively. The applicator type and BT technique were reviewed for all implants. Dose/fractionation was evaluated for 46 implants (84%); contours were discussed for 21 (38%). Target and OAR dosimetry were reviewed for 54 (98%) and 28 implants (51%), respectively. Six cases (11%) underwent minor changes to the applicator type to improve target and/or OAR dosimetry. One case (2%) had a major change recommended to the dose/fractionation. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologic BT peer review may enhance BT quality by allowing for implant optimization and formal review of challenging cases, ultimately improving medical decision-making and team communication. Peer review should be implemented in centers offering gynecologic BT.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/standards , Genital Neoplasms, Female/radiotherapy , Peer Review/methods , Radiation Oncology/standards , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Brachytherapy/instrumentation , Brachytherapy/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Hospitals, High-Volume , Humans , Organs at Risk , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Oncology/education , Teaching Rounds
13.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 105(4): 773-783, 2019 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31408667

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We used quantitative magnetic resonance imaging to prospectively analyze the association between microstructural damage to memory-associated structures within the medial temporal lobe and longitudinal memory performance after brain radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a primary brain tumor receiving fractionated brain RT were enrolled on a prospective trial (n = 27). Patients underwent high-resolution volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and neurocognitive testing before and 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT. Medial temporal lobe regions (hippocampus; entorhinal, parahippocampal, and temporal pole white matter [WM]) were autosegmented, quantifying volume and diffusion biomarkers of WM integrity (mean diffusivity [MD]; fractional anisotropy [FA]). Reliable change indices measured changes in verbal (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised) and visuospatial (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised [BVMT-R]) memory. Linear mixed-effects models assessed longitudinal associations between imaging parameters and memory. RESULTS: Visuospatial memory significantly declined at 6 months post-RT (mean reliable change indices, -1.3; P = .012). Concurrent chemotherapy and seizures trended toward a significant association with greater decline in visuospatial memory (P = .053 and P = .054, respectively). Higher mean dose to the left temporal pole WM was significantly associated with decreased FA (r = -0.667; P = .002). Over all time points, smaller right hippocampal volume (P = .021), lower right entorhinal FA (P = .023), greater right entorhinal MD (P = .047), and greater temporal pole MD (BVMT-R total recall, P = .003; BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .042) were associated with worse visuospatial memory. The interaction between right entorhinal MD (BVMT-R total recall, P = .021; BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .004) and temporal pole FA (BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .024) significantly predicted visuospatial memory performance. CONCLUSIONS: Brain tumor patients exhibited visuospatial memory decline post-RT. Microstructural damage to critical memory regions, including the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe WM, were associated with post-RT memory decline. The integrity of medial temporal lobe structures is critical to memory performance post-RT, representing possible avoidance targets for memory preservation.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Memory Disorders/etiology , Memory/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/complications , Temporal Lobe/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , Agnosia/diagnosis , Agnosia/etiology , Anisotropy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cranial Irradiation/methods , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Entorhinal Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Entorhinal Cortex/radiation effects , Female , Functional Neuroimaging , Hippocampus/diagnostic imaging , Hippocampus/radiation effects , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Recall/drug effects , Mental Recall/radiation effects , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Prospective Studies , Seizures/complications , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , White Matter/radiation effects , Young Adult
14.
Head Neck ; 41(7): 2182-2189, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30723965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Submandibular gland transfer (SMGT) mitigates radiation-induced xerostomia but has yet to be widely adopted. We evaluate the feasibility of incorporating SMGT at multiple academic institutions and report the incidence of treatment delay. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were identified who underwent SMGT. Time points pertaining to diagnosis and key treatment events including SMGT, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation were extracted. Treatment delay was defined as either >60 days from diagnosis to definitive therapy or >6 weeks between surgery and adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Median time from diagnosis to primary treatment was 42 days (IQR, 32-54). Median time from surgery to adjuvant therapy was 33 days (IQR, 28-47). Delay in starting treatment was observed in 7/49 patients (14%). Six patients incurred a delay in postoperative radiation therapy (6/19; 32%). CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate care coordination, SMGT can be implemented into a clinical pathway with a goal of decreasing radiation-induced xerostomia without increasing treatment delays.


Subject(s)
Organ Sparing Treatments , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Submandibular Gland/surgery , Xerostomia/prevention & control , Contraindications, Procedure , Feasibility Studies , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies
15.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 549, 2018 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29743050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While data from several studies over the last decade has demonstrated that introduction of immunologic checkpoint blockage therapy with anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 drugs leads to improved survival in metastatic melanoma patients, relatively little is known about brain-specific therapeutic response and adverse events in the context of immunotherapeutic treatment of intracranial disease. Here we report two independent cases of new intracranial metastases presenting after initiation of combined checkpoint blockade Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for recurrent metastatic melanoma in the context of positive systemic disease response. CASE PRESENTATION: Case #1: A 43-year-old Caucasian male with Stage III melanoma of the left knee had subsequent nodal, hepatic and osseous metastases and was started on ipilimumab/nivolumab. He developed an intractable headache one week later. MRI revealed new enhancing and hemorrhagic brain metastases. After 6 weeks of immunotherapy, there was interval hemorrhage of a dominant intracranial lesion but substantial improvement in systemic metastatic disease. Durable, near complete intracranial and systemic response was achieved after completion of both induction and maintenance immunotherapy. Case #2: A 58-year old Caucasian woman with stage II melanoma of the right index finger developed cutaneous, pulmonary and hepatic metastases within 4 months of adjuvant radiation. Although combined checkpoint blockade resulted in improvement in both cutaneous and systemic disease, brain MR performed for eye discomfort demonstrated new enhancing and hemorrhagic brain metastases. Serial MR imaging five months later revealed only a solitary focus of brain enhancement with continued improved systemic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These cases raise the question of whether the initial immune activation and modulation of the blood brain barrier by Ipilimumab/Nivolumab somehow "unmasks" previously clinically silent metastatic disease, rather than representing new or progressive metastatic disease. An overview of currently available literature discussing the role of immune checkpoint blockade in the treatment of intracranial metastatic melanoma will be provided, as well as discussion highlighting the need for future work elucidating the response of brain metastases to anti-CTLA/PD-1 drugs and documentation of brain-specific adverse events.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Melanoma/secondary , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
16.
World Neurosurg ; 114: e719-e728, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29551723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the natural history and etiology of cystic formation after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM). We aimed to characterize the natural history of cyst formation after SRS of BM and analyze potential risk factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 214 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 1106 SRSs for BM. Demographic, clinical, dosimetric, and magnetic resonance imaging MRI data were reviewed. Statistical analysis was accomplished using Student's t test, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The median patient age was 61 years (range, 19-91 years), and the median duration of follow-up was 424 days (range, 91-2934 days). Eleven cases of cyst formation (0.9% of 1106 treated lesions) were identified at SRS-treated BM sites among 9 patients (2 patients developed cysts at independent sites). The median interval between first SRS and first evidence of cyst was 218 days. Seven of the 9 patients (78%) sustained progressive cyst expansion and neurologic decline requiring steroid treatment. Four of these 7 patients (57%) experienced continued neurologic decline and needed surgical fenestration. On univariate analysis, receipt of >4 rounds of SRS was the sole variable associated with an increased risk of cyst formation (odds ratio, 16.58; P = 0.001). This association remained robust after adjusting for duration of follow-up (odds ratio, 13.59; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience with 1106 SRS-treated cases of BM, cyst formation was a rare phenomenon. However, 1 in 3 patients who underwent >4 rounds of SRS sustained cyst formation. A high proportion (78%) of SRS-associated cysts progressively expanded and required medical or surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Radiosurgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Female , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Radiosurgery/methods , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
18.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 7(6): e569-e578, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28711334

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: As knowledge-based planning (KBP) attempts to augment and potentially supplant manual treatment planning, it is imperative to ensure any implementation maintains or improves overall plan quality in any disease site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the overall quality of KBP-driven automated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning using blinded physician comparison and determine systematic factors predictive of physician plan preference to guide future KBP refinement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Automated noncoplanar volume modulated arc therapy KBP routines were developed for 199 plans across 3 clinical SRS scenarios: isolated lesions (isolated), lesions closely abutting (<3 cm) organs at risk (involved), and single-isocenter multiple metastases (multimet). Overall plan quality and preference were assessed via blinded review of the plans by two SRS physicians. Quantitative quality metrics were also compared to determine systematic differences in the treatment plans. Multiple parameters were investigated as predictors of KBP plan selection. RESULTS: For the isolated, involved, and multimet scenarios, the KBP plans were considered to be superior or equivalent to clinical plans 86.7% (91/105), 81.1% (43/53), and 78.1% (32/41) of the time, respectively. All investigated quality metrics were equivalent or indicated more sparing for all KBP plans. The only nondosimetric predictor was planning target volume in the isolated (P = .02) and involved (P = .05) groups. The dosimetric predictors for the isolated group were gradient measure and heterogeneity index (both P < .01). In the multimet category, the only significant dosimetric predictor was interlesion dose (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated KBP SRS plans were equivalent or superior to previously treated plans in 83.4% (166/199) of cases. In clinical implementation, geometric features found to be predictive of KBP performance can be used to identify plans where KBP results might benefit from further refinement, whereas dosimetric predictive features could be used to further refine KBP optimization priorities.


Subject(s)
Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Brain Stem/radiation effects , Humans , Knowledge Bases , Physicians , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Radiotherapy Dosage
19.
Med Phys ; 44(10): 5001-5009, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28731267

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Single-isocenter, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases (multimets) can deliver highly conformal dose distributions and reduce overall patient treatment time compared to other techniques. However, treatment planning for multimet cases is highly complex due to variability in numbers and sizes of brain metastases, as well as their relative proximity to organs-at-risk (OARs). The purpose of this study was to automate the VMAT planning of multimet cases through a knowledge-based planning (KBP) approach that adapts single-target SRS dose predictions to multiple target predictions. METHODS: Using a previously published artificial neural network (ANN) KBP system trained on single-target, linac-based SRS plans, 3D dose distribution predictions for multimet patients were obtained by treating each brain lesion as a solitary target and subsequently combining individual dose predictions into a single distribution. Spatial dose distributions di(r→) for each of the i = 1…N lesions were merged using the combination function d(r→)=∑iNdin(r→)1/n. The optimal value of n was determined by minimizing root-mean squared (RMS) difference between clinical multimet plans and predicted dose per unit length along the line profile joining each lesion in the clinical cohort. The gradient measure GM=[3/4π]1/3V50%1/3-V100%1/3 is the primary quality metric for SRS plan evaluation at our institution and served as the main comparative metric between clinical plans and the KBP results. A total of 41 previously treated multimet plans, with target numbers ranging from N = 2-10, were used to validate the ANN predictions and subsequent KBP auto-planning routine. Fully deliverable KBP plans were developed by converting predicted dose distribution into patient-specific optimization objectives for the clinical treatment planning system (TPS). Plan parity was maintained through identical arc configuration and target normalization. Overall plan quality improvements were quantified by calculating the difference between SRS quality metrics (QMs): ΔQM = QMclinical  - QMKBP . In addition to GM, investigated QMs were: volume of brain receiving ≥ 10 Gy (V10 Gy ), volume of brain receiving ≥ 5 Gy (ΔV5 Gy ), heterogeneity index (HI), dose to 0.1 cc of the brainstem (D0.1 cc ), dose to 1% of the optic chiasm (D1% ), and interlesion dose (DIL ). In addition to this quantitative analysis, overall plan quality was assessed via blinded plan comparison of the manual and KBP treatment plans by SRS-specializing physicians. RESULTS: A dose combination factor of n = 8 yielded an integrated dose profile RMS difference of 2.9% across the 41-patient cohort. Multimet dose predictions exhibited ΔGM = 0.07 ± 0.10 cm against the clinical sample, implying either further normal tissue sparing was possible or that dose predictions were slightly overestimating achievable dose gradients. The latter is the more likely explanation, as this bias vanished when dose predictions were converted to deliverable KBP plans ΔGM = 0.00 ± 0.08 cm. Remaining QMs were nearly identical or showed modest improvements in the KBP sample. Equivalent QMs included: ΔV10 Gy  = 0.37 ± 3.78 cc, ΔHI = 0.02 ± 0.08 and ΔDIL  = -2.22 ± 171.4 cGy. The KBP plans showed a greater degree of normal tissue sparing as indicated by brain ΔV5 Gy  = 4.11± 24.05 cc, brainstem ΔD0.1 cc  = 42.8 ± 121.4 cGy, and chiasm ΔD1%  = 50.8 ± 83.0 cGy. In blinded review by SRS-specializing physicians, KBP-generated plans were deemed equivalent or superior in 32/41(78.1%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Heuristic KBP-driven automated planning in linac-based, single-isocenter treatments for multiple brain metastases maintained or exceeded overall plan quality.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Heuristics , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Radiotherapy Dosage
20.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(19): 5696-5702, 2017 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28679776

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Preclinical models have shown that the effectiveness of GL-ONC1, a modified oncolytic vaccinia virus, is enhanced by radiation and chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of GL-ONC1 when delivered intravenously with chemoradiotherapy to patients with primary, nonmetastatic head and neck cancer.Experimental Design: Patients with locoregionally advanced unresected, nonmetastatic carcinoma of the head/neck, excluding stage III-IVA p16-positive oropharyngeal cancers, were treated with escalating doses and cycles of intravenous GL-ONC1, along with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary aims were to define the MTD and dose-limiting toxicities, and to recommend a dose for phase II trials.Results: Between May 2012 and December 2014, 19 patients were enrolled. The most frequent adverse reactions included grade 1-2 rigors, fever, fatigue, and rash. Grade 3 adverse reactions included hypotension, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting. In 2 patients, the rash was confirmed as viral in origin by fluorescence imaging and viral plaque assay. In 4 patients, viral presence in tumor was confirmed on midtreatment biopsy by quantitative PCR. In 1 patient, live virus was confirmed in a tongue tumor 7 days after receiving the first dose of virus. The MTD was not reached. With median follow-up of 30 months, 1-year (2-year) progression-free survival and overall survival were 74.4% (64.1%) and 84.6% (69.2%), respectively.Conclusions: Delivery of GL-ONC1 is safe and feasible in patients with locoregionally advanced head/neck cancer undergoing standard chemoradiotherapy. A phase II study is warranted to further investigate this novel treatment strategy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(19); 5696-702. ©2017 AACR.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oncolytic Virotherapy , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Oncolytic Viruses/genetics , Vaccinia virus/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...